Integrated
Pest
Management of Roses
This section of the Connecticut Rose
Society’s website is focused on Integrated Pest Management.
Modern roses are not pest-free by nature.
It can be said, without reservation:
Exhibition-quality hybrid teas and floribundas will generally require
spray protection for fungal and insect pests to be competitive.
Roses will require pest protection to perform at their best.
Some roses require a great deal less chemical help than others.
There are varying levels of treatment available.
Everyone can benefit from a sound approach to pest management- using the
right weapon for the actual pest challenge facing the roses.
Different gardeners have different thresholds for acceptance of pests.
Knowledge is Power.
The
information and links presented is not a choir.
There is a thread of melodious thought, but not harmony.
A variety of initial points of departure differentiate the material.
The scale ranges from No Controls to Total Organic to a Conscientious,
Deliberate Approach to Pest Management. The
latter point of view is emphasized. Total
Organic is a necessary choice for some, but is not generally practical for most
of our members, due primarily to the climate we face, and the newer roses we
tend to grow. Furthermore, in order
to provide a broad-ranging source of information (given that linked articles are
provided without editing), articles that emphasize a different climate from CT
(and in some cases different sets of pests) may be included in the
discussion/links if there is significant merit to other parts of the article.
Bad propaganda has been screened. Articles that are generally good, but
with weaknesses, are included in the site/links.
The reader should be alert to different, and, rarely, erroneous, points
of view.
The
assistance and enthusiasm of the following made this section possible:
Gill Smits
Deb Haydock
Tim Abbey- CT
Agricultural Experiment Station
The
IPM Principals that should apply to most
Connecticut
Rose Growers
are distilled (edited) to these:
1.
If spraying is personally not
acceptable, or is highly objectionable, select roses that are disease-resistant
to begin with. These include
rugosas, old roses in general and shrubs. More
modern roses, hybrid teas and floribundas, generally are not as disease
resistant. Further, Japanese Beetles tend to favor yellow and white blooms over
darker ones. If you can’t use insecticides, consider avoiding light colors.
2.
If you are not constrained by time
available for the garden, you have more flexibility for less ‘toxic’ methods
that require frequent application and effort. These may include Frequently
manual picking off beetles, frequent high pressure water sprays of all roses for
aphids and spider mites, application of weak solutions of chemicals that don’t
stick or last (sodium bicarbonate) (and must be repeated after every rain),
defensive water sprays for fungal diseases that must dry later in the day to be
successful (and are thus most effective in the Early Morning, when most folks
are getting ready for work). If
Available Time is an issue, and there is a low tolerance for pests, you must be
more aggressive.
3.
If you use your roses primarily for
cutting for indoors, consider accepting more pest damage in the garden, then
spending more effort toward cleaning/grooming the stems before display in the
vase.
4.
Remember that the more
objectionable part of spray materials might be the solvent/propellant, not the
active ingredient. A wetable powder
may be a good answer where the petroleum-based solvent is the issue.
5.
Treat for the pests you need to,
only when you need to; not widespread anti-everything spraying.
Know the seasons (weather conditions) that favor fungal problems. For
insects: aphids can be controlled fairly successfully without insecticides, or
with mild ones. Japanese Beetles are
usually only a problem in CT for a period from the beginning of July for about
six weeks. Thereafter, they are much
fewer in number (and potentially acceptable without treatment). Fungal Rust, and
some insects common to the west coast, are not prevalent in
CT-
and so need not be defended against.
6.
Systemic fungicides are designed to
be applied to a growing rose plant’s leaves and stems. There is low benefit
from spraying the ground and mulch- since they are not contact fungus killers.
And this uses far more spray material than would be necessary to fully
coat the leaves! For that matter, use a very fine spray pattern (fog-like).
Don’t overuse or over spray. Science has determined that leaves have two
sides- and both need coverage; but the maximum amount of coverage needed for the
leaves is 100%. Overspray is not
helpful; it is wasteful and not environment-friendly.
7.
Fall clean up as part of the
Winterizing the Rose Garden process is important, and can be done without
chemicals. Keeping the garden free
of disease one year goes a long way toward the ability of the rose to survive
Connecticut
’s biggest pest: cold, windy winters.
So
take a look at the collection of articles and links to other websites provided
here in this section. After
reviewing, re-make deliberate decisions concerning your personal rose garden
goals and pest tolerance. Then plot
a course for Managing your Pests in an Integrated manner.
Consider contacting a Consulting Rosarian (from
New England
, where the climate/weather are understood and the pests are common) to
compare your plan with another person. CR’s
can be a huge help in the planning and action IPM process.
Articles and
Links:
1.
Integrated
Pest
Management of Roses. Dept. of
Horticulture, Cornell
http://www.gardening.cornell.edu/
Generally
good discussion, location focus is Upstate NY.
2.
Integrated
Pest
Management in a Nutshell. Siri
Amrit
Khalasa.
http://www.tigerflag.com/ (then
click on Siri Amrit's Homepage on the left)
Good discussion- mainly roses, but
could be applied to other gardening.
3.
University of Connecticut Integrated Pest Management
www.hort.uconn.edu/ipm/ipmprog.htm
4.
IPM in the Northeast Region
www.northeastipm.org
6.
Deleted
7.
Using Organic Fungicides. Ron Wolford.
Univ.
of
IL Extension
http://www.urbanext.uiuc.edu/greenline/03v1/07.html
Really non-commercial; not organic. Discusses
Bordeaux mixture, lime-sulfur, sulfur, copper…
an ok article.
8.
Environmentally Friendly Rose Care. Cindy
Fake, Horticultural & Small Farms Advisor, Placer &
Nevada Counties
,
CA
.
Pub. 31-147. Oct. 2001.
http://ucce.ucdavis.edu/files/filelibrary/1808/1338.pdf
Short, but useful. West coast
slant.
9.
University
of
Minnesota
IPM Links.
www://ipmworld.umn.edu/favorite.htm
10.
IPM Institute
www.ipminstitute.org
11.
Use of Baking Soda as a Fungicide. NCAT Agri. Specialists. Nov 2001.
http://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/bakingsoda.html
Fair.
Not directly rose-focused, but discusses the rose-directed product
Remedy.
12.
IMP in the US
www.recusda.gov/agsys/nipmn/index.htm
13.
Pest
Management at the Crossroads
www.pmac.net/
14.
Database of IPM Resources.
www.ippc.orst.edu/cicp/crops/ornamental.htm
15.
Gempler’s IPM Almanac.
www.ipmalmanac.com/
16.
University
of
Maryland
IPM.
www.agnr.umd.edu/users/ipmnet/
17.
University of Massachusetts
AgroEcology.
www.umass.edu/umext/agroecology/
18.
CICP Database of IPM Resources
www.ippc.orst.edu/dir/
19.
Resource List for Pesticide
Alternatives
www.members.aol.com/homeview2/info/
20.
Insect Parasitic Nematodes
www2.oardc.ohio-state.edu/nematodes/
21.
Radcliffe’s IPM World Textbook
www.ipmworld.umn.edu/ipmsite.htm
22.
Biocontrol Network
www.biconet.com/index.html
23.
National Park Service IPM Manual
www1.nature.nps.gov/wv/ipm/tmanual.htm
24.
Suppliers of Beneficial
Organisms
www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/ipminov/bscover.htm
25.
Koppert Biological Systems
www.koppert.nl/e005.shtml
26.
Forestry IPM
www.aces.edu/department/ipm/frstipm.htm
|